| |
HEALING THE FAMILY
Excerpts from Bernard Dubois' book: "Guerir en famille"
chapter one
THE ANTHROPOLOGY OF
THE FAMILY
Introduction
We
must of necessity define the anthropological foundations of the family
before we can outline a path of healing for it. Indeed, during the past
twenty years, the family has been especially under attack, and today is
subject to the wrath of Satan. If the family is currently the target of
choice, the reason is clearly because it is the final battle. The Holy
Father made reference to this during the celebration of Family Day, when he
acknowledged that the very moment of the attempt on his life came during the
first day of the Commission on the family.
That is why, in order
to brave such a spiritual battle, we must have as our support the model that
our Savior has given us: his own Family.
1. The Holy Family:
a Model
Within the family, the
woman is the most severely tested. During the second half of the twentieth
century, she has gone through an important phase in her growth in humanity
by acquiring a certain liberation from man and a better understanding of her
unique place within the couple. However, she is heading toward the dramatic
loss of her significant calling by God. If the woman forgets God and her
irreplaceable role in the salvation of humanity, then man, in turn, will be
lost. For he is born of woman and without her help, he will no longer know
who he is, and he will no longer be able to become himself. He will not be
able to fulfill his calling as man, husband and father.
To remedy this
situation we need to discover in the person of Mary a totally feminine
woman, a spouse and a mother according to the heart of God. Mary can become
a healing model for the woman and help her to recover her true calling. And
furthermore, she draws us into the Holy Family and puts the Child Jesus in
us. Thus, through her Son, she brings us into the Family of the Trinity and
gives us Life divine.
But we cannot fully
live in intimacy with the Holy Family if our spiritual life remains centered
on the persons of Christ and the Virgin Mary, without giving
Saint Joseph
his fair place. To do so would be to lessen the Holy Family and distort the
reality of the Incarnation of the Word of God. We must no longer separate
the husband from the wife, the adoptive father from his child,
Saint Joseph
from the Virgin Mary and from their son Jesus. When God decided to come live
among men, when he opened the heavens and descended, he spoke not to a
single woman but to a couple. It is written in the Gospel of Saint Luke,
The angel Gabriel was sent by God (…) to a virgin betrothed to a man named
Joseph, of the House of David, and the virgin’s name was Mary (Lk 1: 26,27).
(Biblical quotes are from the
Jerusalem
Bible, unless otherwise cited.)
Scripture is careful to
specify, even before naming her, that the young woman was given in marriage
to Joseph, of the house of David. God is announcing by this fact the
Incarnation: he speaks to a family, to a house of royal blood, and to
ordinary people. The first name spoken by the evangelist is that of Joseph,
who then fades to make room for Mary. In this way the Holy Family is
connected to a past. If we forget this man, not only are we missing out on a
model husband and father whom we greatly need, but we are also skimping on a
part of the Incarnation, which will have serious consequences.
Unfortunately, this is what is currently happening too often in the West.
Trinitarian life is not given to us through only one person – Mary – but
also through Joseph, which is to say through a couple, through a family.
This truth is embodied and its consequences are enormous.
2. Man, a
Developing Member of the Family
To better understand
what follows, we need to remember two essential anthropological notions that
will help us discover the importance of living in the Holy Family.
- Man is a person in
the process of becoming, a developing person. At each moment, no matter
where he is, or what he is doing, he is capable of change. He is a being on
the move.
The more one adheres to
this dynamic vision of man, the more one grasps the mission of the mentor or
of the teacher. Their work consists in facilitating change, of introducing
it or of allowing it to happen. We can be those who reveal the capacity in
the child (or in the adult) to introduce change into his or her life.
Man is also a communal
being and part of a family. He was created to live in relation to others
because it is not good that the man should be alone (Gen
2:18).
He can only truly be himself by being included in a larger family unit. In
the Judeo-Christian tradition, the family is the only authentic social and
spiritual reality. The couple does not exist for itself alone, as an end in
itself. It is destined to be fruitful and multiply (Gen
1:28).
Promoting the idea of the couple – as self-sufficient – is a modern and
secular notion deriving from an egocentric behavior in an individualistic
mindset. The same holds true with the nuclear family (parents with only one
or two children).
The Lord wishes to
rebuild the family. To do so he sets forth a simple, idyllic family scene
and develops also, with the guidance of the Holy Spirit, “New Communities”
which restore a true picture of the family: all age groups are represented.
In Africa
and in certain countries of the
Far East, the family is
still made up of parents, grandparents, uncles and aunts, male and female
cousins. In the houses of the Community of the Beatitudes, one can see just
how healing it is to have the presence of children and older adults (a
“grandmother” or a “grandfather”). Such is the work of God. These larger
families have a calling, as an image of the Holy Family, to be homes of love
and of light, places of healing, of calm, and of rebuilding identity for
young people today.
THE FAMILY,
IMAGE OF THE TRINITY
1. The Trinitarian
Model
God is family. Man is a
familial being for he has been created in the image of the Holy Trinity. He
is endlessly invited to enter into the trinitarian dynamic among the divine
Persons who love each other and who constantly live a relationship of love,
in the deepest respect of the identity of each. The Father loves the Son and
has entrusted everything to him (cf. Jn 3:35). The Son loves the Father and
does whatever he sees the Father doing (cf. Jn 5:19). The Holy Spirit is the
communion of love which binds the Father to the Son and the Son to the
Father. Each person of the Trinity is absolutely unique, but at the same
time completely bound to the two others.
The love of the Father,
Son and Spirit is characterised by a flowing circular motion, a flow of
love. Within the Trinity, the three Persons are in a relationship of
communal union. Each person receives completely the gift of the two others
and gives himself completely, producing a permanent flow wherein each
empties himself and is filled with the other, each is received and receives
the other. Thus, there is a relational dynamic which is the characteristic
of love.
Love: The unique
impulse in God
Here is the trinitarian
model, the perfect model: God is love (I Jn 4:8), God is love alone,
free flowing love, love which gives itself and pours itself out endlessly.
The Holy Family is a “little Trinity on the earth,” because between Mary and
Joseph, close to Jesus, is lived the same dynamic of love, the same
completeness of receiving and of mutual giving. In the Holy Trinity as in
the Holy Family, each one of the persons receives and gives himself. We
have none other than the Divine Family as our model; it is revealed to us,
incarnate, in the Holy Family. The secret of every human family is contained
in this relationship: each person is completed by giving himself or herself
to the other. God is family and by making man, he did nothing other than
create a family. In the family, each person offers himself or herself,
respecting personal identity and togetherness, as St. Gregory of Nysse has
explained it (Les Sentences des Pères du désert, Nouveau recueil,
Abbaye saint Pierre de Solesmes, 72. Sablé sur Sarthe, 1970, n.2, p. 13):
the “three divine suns” give only one and the same light. It will therefore
be the Trinity that we take as our model. We cannot be father, mother,
child, we cannot be family, if we do not participate in the free flowing
exchange of this trinitarian love.
God has included man in
trinitarian action.
From the first moment
of the creation of the couple, God has included man in this trinitarian
movement, in this circular, familial motion. Certainly man is distinct from
God, for he is only a creature fashioned from clay; but this clay molded by
God has been given life by his breath, and so has received the first fruits
of the Holy Spirit. From that moment on, God lives in man and man becomes
the dwelling of God. Thanks to the initial breath of life, then to the
fullness of grace offered through the sacrament of baptism, we are brought
into the flow of love. The Holy Spirit, always present in the innermost part
of man, causes us to live in relationship with the Father and the Son,
continually placing us within the trinitarian dynamic.
Through Mary…
It is to Mary,
full of grace (Lk 1:28), because she has been endowed with the
fullness of the Spirit, that the mission is given of ushering us into
trinitarian life. By giving her the task of bringing the Son to the Father,
the Spirit has taken her in a special way into the flow of love.
If we
contemplate this trinitarian mystery, if we let ourselves be brought into
it, we will be able to reconstruct a fully human and Christian family. But
for that to be possible, we must live in the Trinity, we must make incarnate
in a way, through the grace of the Holy Family, this divine love. We are
all, in our families or in our communities, places of incarnation for the
Holy Trinity.
2. Original Sin
However, experience
tells us that we do not live it. Why not? Because of sin, in particular,
original sin which takes us out of the flow of love. Outside of the dynamic
of love, no life is possible, and man is subject to the pain of his hurts,
of suffering and of death. Sin has cut him off from love and has pulled him
from its three fold movement.
How is this possible?
Because of pride. And in fact it is this other dynamic that the Serpent
suggests to man: a dynamic of severance which places man outside of the flow
of love, resulting in three consequences: the refusal to accept and welcome,
the refusal to give and the disruption of the relationship.
The Refusal to Welcome
Pride manifests itself
first in the refusal to receive and welcome. I no longer receive anything
from anyone, I no longer expect anything from another because of doubt and
suspicion that have been introduced into the relationship; I want to deal
only with myself. The proud person no longer wants to receive from his
parents, nor, consequently from God, knowledge, discernment, law and
standards of morality, love of enemies and forgiveness…He is his own master,
he breaks with the dynamic of welcoming and of giving, wherein he is
fulfilled by loving others. He wants to do it all for himself by himself,
meaning be all he can be alone, independently. No longer having an open
attitude, he becomes one who takes what he needs from others and who tells
anyone who wants to listen to him that he is a self-made man, and that all
this originates with him: “I know,” “I can,” “I’ll manage by myself.”
At a most basic level,
he is cutting himself off from the Father’s care. In a very concrete way,
this means that he is cutting himself off, in his childhood hurt, from his
own parents. At a psychological level, the break rebounds into a spiritual
break with the Father. This results in a particular pathology widespread
among today’s young people: the pathology of identity.
The Refusal
to Give
Alongside of the
refusal to receive is the refusal to give, the second consequence of pride.
We have here a pathology of selfishness, “all for me.” I no longer give, and
I no longer give myself, but I appropriate things and people, and I keep
them for myself. Futher, what I take becomes the substitute of what I am. I
replace my own identity that I am no longer receiving from God and from
another, with what I acquire. I become a substitute self, and my identity is
heavily dependent on what I have or on my influence or my appearance.
Independence and
Dependent Relationships
The third consequence
of pride appears in relationships. Depending on when and how it plays out
with different people, the result will be an independent attitude or a
dependent relationship.
- Independence means,
“I don’t need you,” “I don’t expect anything from you because I’m perfectly
capable of managing all by myself,” and “I’m not getting anything from you,
so I don’t have to give anything to you.”
- In other cases, this
will result in a dependent relationship, meaning a substitute love because
the flow of trinitarian love is broken. “I’m in a relationship with you so I
can dominate you and swallow you up by making you into what I what.” The
other person is only the object of my self interest; the other becomes the
object I use, and I take from this person even what he or she doesn’t want
to give me. I think of myself as the center of the world. My identity
depends on the disappearance of the other’s identity. The relationship is
lived out as a power struggle in which I dominate the other.
In another person, the
situation can well be the reverse. In this case, “I let myself be dominated
and swallowed up by you, hoping in this way that you will continue to love
me and give me my identity.” My relationship to the other comes through the
negation of myself. I am the object which the other is using, and I am
willing that the other is the center of my inside world. Because I am afraid
of losing this love, I renounce whatever I think, want, or love – especially
when I am not in agreement with this person.
Emotional Immaturity
Whether I dominate the
other by hindering his or her development or whether I let myself be
dominated by denying who I am, in both cases we have a dependent
relationship, deadly in the long run. This process happens each time that we
leave the flow of trinitarian love. It characterises the immature emotional
state in which the person is enslaved by feelings of fear, anger, jealousy…
The person retreats into such isolation that a meaningful relationship turns
out to be impossible.
In order to leave
behind childish emotions and discover true spiritual childhood, we first
need to understand the nature of the initial hurt which resulted in a
breakdown in the flow of love, in order then to regain the way to
restauration.
3. The Work of
Mourning
How can we get love to
flow in us again? Through what may be called the work of mourning, meaning a
work of giving birth which allows passage from one state to another. We come
to this point of mourning because we have moved away from a trinitarian way
of living. We have built ourselves on self centeredness and independence, on
dependent relationships and childish emotions. That is why re-education
becomes necessary. Our identity does not form itself: it is formed and it
becomes what it is by giving. If we were not centered on ourselves, we would
not need to to undergo this new birth (Jn 3:3). The work of mourning is a
work of sanctification, a passage, by means of the Cross, from
self-centeredness to self-sacrifice. If we were continually living as thank
offerings to God, the work of mourning would no longer be necessary.
The
Courage to be Afraid
We come now to a huge
difficulty, to the crux in the process of mourning. We are afraid of death.
Hanging on to substitute selves, we fear LOSING all that we are holding
tight: our possessions, our abilities, our appearance. Every situation of
loss, every letting go is lived in the fear of being the potential death of
our very self. But really, it is not at all like that. The only things that
will disappear are the substitutes for love, and our true identity, our
deepest self with all of its capacity to love, will remain. This is why, as
Chouraqui says, “death precedes life!” for death opens up to greater life.
One can even say with confidence that, thanks to Christ’s victory, death is
swallowed up by life, that our fears are vain and imaginary. Teresa of the
Child Jesus, no stranger to the agony of dying, said about her own death,
“I’m not dying, I’m entering life.” Some might say that she certainly is
dead … ! But no, she has not died, for she now lives at the heart of
circulating trinitarian love. In Teresa, death has henceforth been
vanquished.
From Childishness to
the Little Way
The passage from
childishness to the little way necessitates a meaningful break and death to
the self. For Teresa of the Child Jesus, the turning point came during the
famous episode at Christmas, 1886. Up until then, she had let herself be
ruled by her emotions and childish behavior. She would cry over nothing at
all, and then she “cried because she had cried.” She couldn’t manage to get
outside of herself. This particular Christmas, when she was fourteen, her
father precipitated a crisis with a painfully weary reflection:
“Fortunately, this is the last year!” Teresa fell into profound crisis, both
in human and spiritual terms, behaving childishly by shutting herself up
with her sorrow alone in her room. At this point, however, Teresa decided to
act differently. She dried her tears and came down the staircase as if
nothing had happened. The little way was beginning for her.
Confronting a new
Choice
In our life stories
too, there are episodes of Christmas. Maybe we have lived in a similar
situation and we haven’t accepted it because it was calling for a
renouncement, a death to ourselves. It is important to locate these events
in the lives of the people that we mentor, in order to help them make a new
choice, a decision to change which will always include moving from
self-centeredness to self-sacrifice. By symbolically placing them in the key
situation or event, at the moment when they said no, we allow them to
discover that the path of change is still possible today. They can enter
into the little way of childhood and live from now on in encircling love.
Making a Memorial of
the Past
Besides confronting a
new choice, a second way to leave our deadening attachments to the past is
to use this past to make a remembrance out of these experiences that the
Lord has allowed to happen. Making a memorial consists of making a eucharist
(an action of thanksgiving), which is to say consciously recognizing that
successive letting-go moments are in fact means of growth: “I’m not dying;
I’m entering into life.”
Providence shows forth
the fatherhood of God through events. Providence is made up of pleasant,
smooth times, but also sad and stressful times. These latter times lead us
to acts of letting-go, to times of mourning that will make us grow if we
know how to make a memorial of them. Then, this particular experience,
sometimes so tragic, becomes a sacred moment. What was for me fear of the
unknown becomes an “experience of confidence.” To have confidence in another
consists in living through the fear of what is to come, making a leap into
the unknown, confronting the doubt that there is nothing on the other side,
accepting the fundamental insecurity of not counting only on oneself, on
what one knows, on what one possesses. Confidence helps us go beyond the
fear of giving something up, the fear of suffering, the uncertainty of what
is to come.
What will never change
in life is the fact that it is a never ending work of mourning, moving from
the state of sinner to that of rebirth. Life is full of occasions of death
ready for rebirth. Each death is a passage which opens to more life. There
can be no reintegration into trinitarian love without going through this
acceptance of mourning.
4. The Trinitarian
Structure of the Family
In mentoring and in
helping situations, in educational struggles, or in marital conflicts, we
may well ask the question: Where is the breakdown in the trinitarian
relationship of father, mother, child?
This is a realistic
question. We have lived, for the first twenty years of our life, in a family
that should have been another “little Trinity on earth.” We have been the
son or daughter of our mother or father. There was a certain flow of love –
more or less present, sometimes more notable by its absence. This childhood
past is not gone, it is not buried, it hasn’t come down to a few old ashes
that can be warmed up; rather, it is perfectly present and still active in
daily life.
Today we deal with
father equivalents (the Pope, a plant director, an abbot, the shepherd of a
prayer group, the parish priest, a father-in-law…), mother equivalents (a
mother-in-law or life giving places such as a community, the Church, a
prayer group, the parish…), and we experience relational difficulties with
those who evidence upheaval going back to the early stages of love. For how
I live out my relationships today – in my behavior, in my emotions – shows
that my childhood is definitely present in the here and now. (see diagram
1).
The Numbers Two and
Three
We are born into a
family and we need a family in order to grow. For a family to function it
must be on the trinitarian model of “three” in “one.” Thus, the Jewish
tradition teaches that the letter beth (b) which is also the number
two, manifests the created, whereas aleph (a), the “one” is the
expression of unity, the divine. The “two” cannot be sufficient unto itself,
for it runs the risk of collapsing into a destructive one against one. It
calls the “three” and the “one”. So the couple is never an end in itself,
and in order to flourish, it must open up to the communion of mutual love (they
become one body, Gen 2:24) and fertility (be fruitful and multiply,
Gen 1:28).
Abnormalities appear
each time there is a breakdown of relationships within the trinitarian
model. The three in one relationship is reduced and replaced by a certain
number of dual relationships, with the members then falling into a potential
dependent relationship based on selfish behavior whose main consequences are
loss of identity and loss of growth.
In order to
re-establish the trinitarian dynamic, we must identify where and why the
relationship became dual. Then a third must be introduced between the two
persons so that identity and growth can again take place. Every human
relationship calls for openness. There can be no couple or no family without
openness, just as there would be no trinitarian circulation of love without
openness. In the Gospels we see how Jesus does battle against all that walls
in a person: withdrawal into self, into one’s own religion (when he gives
the Samaritans by way of example, he resolutely breaks with the
discrimination that the Jews practiced toward them. Cf. Lk 10:33; 17,18; Jn
4:40), a rigid interpretation of the law (the sabbath was made for man
and not man for the sabbath Mk 2:27), and notably closure of the family.
There is no one who has left house, brothers, sisters, mother, father,
children or land for my sake…(Mk 10:29). It is not peace I have come to
bring, but a sword( Mt 10:34). Jesus came to open again what had been
closed in order to bring us into the Trinitarian Family. Coming from a
family that has given us life, we must separate from it in order to
establish a new family, human or spiritual, which will be the place of new
births.
The Right Distance,
Separation and Identity
A family is a unit open
to the outside, whose distinguishing characteristic is a dynamic action of
relating and loving. For there to be action, there must be the right
distance. If there is no distance, there will be dependency and lack of
movement. If there is too much distance, there will be a breakdown,
independence and loss of life and growth. Keeping the right distance, which
guarantees a certain separateness in the relationship and avoids the trap of
indifference, which leads to independence, is most important. With this in
place, personal identity will develop as it should. The right distance,
separation and identity are the three key words of a relationship serving to
tell us whether or not the love is healthy.
In order for a family
to function and live lovingly together, there must be an open relationship
among the members, each being readily available to the others.
- Let’s take, for
example, a very strong dual relationship between two spouses. This may be
observed in certain couples who have voluntarily decided not to have
children. Strong dual relationships may also be observed in couples
suffering from infertility. Often it’s the case that the child is desired
not for its own sake, but for the couple’s sake, giving rise to problems of
bioethics. The child is no longer seen as a gift coming from spousal love.
It becomes a “choice,” an option that one can either refuse or claim as a
right. The child risks becoming an object serving the needs of the couple.
The couple is then closed in upon itself, and the child no longer has the
right to be what it should freely be. The celebrated modern nuclear family
is only a substitute couple whose child comes as the object of dependent
love and as a selfish way of continuing its own existence. It would appear
that the couple gives mutually, but only to each other, and the child
becomes their property.
- In other situations,
it’s the mother who engulfs her children by taking them for herself and
excluding the father (similar to those created without their paternity being
known, according to Fivete in his book Fecondation In Vitro Et
Transplantation d’Embryons). The mother lives in a dependent
relationship with her child. The child can no longer be what it was created
to be and loses its identity. The child “enters into the mother” without
having access to the father, who has been pushed to the outside and rejected
by the mother. The mother no longer fulfills her role which is precisely
that of allowing engagement with the father. This type of pathology is seen
in its neurotic manifestations (obsessions or phobia), in mental anorexia,
and in identity problems, in particular, homophobia.
- The inverse
situation, although more rare, gives the same result: the father-daughter
couple, for example, works to the detriment of the ostracized mother. The
daughter, estranged from her mother, can no longer find an identity model.
She can’t figure out her relationship to her father and she tends to confuse
her position with that of spouse.
Receiving and Giving
It is important, then,
to try always to maintain an openness to love among all members of the
family. They will be able to take root and grow in all directions, each
member receiving from the others, but also having something to give. As soon
as the relationship becomes one-way, abnormalities appear. There are those
who give without receiving and those who receive without being able to give.
In order to trace a pathway to healing, it will be necessary to leave the
dual relationship in order to find the trinitarian relationship; and also,
reintegrate into the two-fold action of receiving and giving.
There is a truth we see
verified all the time in the formation of children. It is this: it is good
to allow a child the opportunity to give something to his parents.
- Forgiving is
an excellent example of this. In order that the child can discover the
richness of forgiveness, in order that he accept the gift of mercy, the
“gift above all gifts,” he has to experience his parents asking forgiveness
for their own mistakes, as, for example, when a punishment has been out of
proportion to the fault committed. Parental authority always comes out
stronger here, because the parents are offering their child a chance to
give. And the child in turn becomes capable of asking for forgiveness.
- The paternal blessing
is an important moment at bedtime. But why not sometimes ask your children
to bless you, during the evening prayer for example? There again, you are
offering them the chance to give you something. You increase their self
concept because they discover the priceless value of the gift of themselves.
They realize they are important to you. They enter into a new circulation of
love, into another way of being which becomes part of who they are.
We have previously seen
that identity problems, so common today, originate in the breakdown of the
relationship between father, mother and child. Each one must now take back
his or her place within the dynamics of the family. The child needs to give
to both father and mother, just as he needs to receive their love. Similarly
the parents give of themselves, but they can also receive from each other
and from their children.
Family pathology is a
result of an abnormality in the trinitarian relationship of love, from a
distortion of giving and receiving, from a lessening, maybe even an absence,
of a give and take relationship between two persons. The other becomes the
object of my desire: I strive to dominate the other, to put the other person
under my influence. I enter into a love-hate relationship with the other. I
love this person, but I suffocate him. I love her but the relationship,
because it turns on itself, is headed towards loneliness.
The introduction of a
third into the dual relationship will change the balance and will, of
necessity, initiate a time of mourning, dying to certain artificial ways of
being, but awakening to new life.
Mentoring work with a
couple will often cause increased distress. This is because the pathway of
healing always begins by opening up the relationship, presupposing a death
to the self. The work of mourning centers around the fact that the isolated
party (for example, the father in the mother-child relationship) becomes
welcomed back. Thanks to a third person coming into the dual relationship,
rightful identity is restored, as little by little the person concerned
moves away from being the center. Such a change is very disruptive to the
person who is changing. It is a call to give, and then finally to release.
This means no longer being in charge, but once more surrendering to
another’s love. How can this be possible? Through confidence followed by a
complete surrender making us lose our sense of security. The task of
becoming childlike is deeply unsettling and we should not be surprised that
a growing intimacy with the Holy Family causes some deep distress or
defensive reactions.
The Example of Some New
Communities
In the context of a
community composed of chaste singles and families living together, we may
find examples which illustrate what we are talking about.
-Single people vowed to
chastity highlight a particular aspect of family life involving all baptized
members. In the past in the Church, before Vatican II, strong emphasis was
put on the difference between the clergy and the faithful laity, between
celibacy and marriage. However, consecration has no need of emphasizing
these differences in order to define its great calling. Celibate singles
give witness to the prophetic grace of the Kingdom. They represent the
wedded union of man with Christ. They witness in their flesh union to Christ
the bridegroom. They are “the spouses of Christ,” not for living in a two
fold relationship but in a three part communion. By intensifying their
nuptuals to the gift of their selves, they grow and discover a true healing,
not only emotionally but also spiritually, in the heart of the larger
community. There is a risk that the celibate single, especially at the
beginning of his or her spiritual life, will seek after “his very own God,”
becoming just “Him and me.” At a spiritual level, this person is recreating
an underlying psychological pathology. For the door to his or her heart is
locked and nobody else can enter. “I’m going to have my own encounter with
my own God.” Others are missing from this relationship which makes no room
for intercession for the world.
It is through the
fruits of love that we can see if the circulation of love is balanced
between a person and the Savior. If the celibate single has a tendancy to
shy away from outward acts of love (such as being helpful, or doing a rather
thankless task…), we can see that he or she is living in a dependent
relationship to God. The path to healing must include the introduction of a
third party. A hermit is an excellent example of what we are talking about,
for he is not content just dwelling with his Lord. Even as he lives in a
spousal relationship, he carries the world in his prayers. Intercession, the
mediation of prayer for the Church and for all of humanity, is a powerful
means of healing for a good number of those in religious orders who have
lost their sense of calling. If they become aware of their unique vocation
as intercessors before the Father, they again find meaning in their lives.
If they open themselves to the entire world in their prayer, they bring
forth fruit. Saint Silouane was able to write: “He who prays for the world
pours out blood from his own heart.” The spousal relationship with Christ,
in consecrated or non-consecrated singleness, is called to bear this kind of
spiritual fruit, visible or invisible.
- By becoming part of a
new community, families also live out a type of consecration. Their presence
alongside chaste singles is prophetic for the Church today. They incarnate
another aspect of the Holy Trinity, in another complementary way. They do
not symbolize first of all a spousal union with Christ, but rather the
mystery of sonship and paternity. The family constantly reminds us that we
are all sons of the same Father, thanks to the Holy Spirit which is guiding
us through Mary. The presence of children, of a father and a mother in a
community, allows each to visualize, to touch, and to experience the action
of trinitarian love which flows between parents and children, meaning
ultimately the love of the Father for the Son and of the Son for the Father.
Such love can only be lived in the Holy Spirit.
The new communities are
prophetic in that they give evidence of trinitarian life. By gathering
chaste singles and families into one community, they show forth
simultaneously the two great callings of the people of God: that of being
wedded to Christ by being consecrated to Him and that of filial devotion to
the Father. This is why these are privileged places of healing for those who
come to spend a few days or months. These extended families, by giving
witness how God’s people live, are called to be genuine “little trinities on
earth.” That is the magnificent work that the Holy Spirit is creating today
in his Church!
God’s teachings come
through the family. Parents are an image of the Father for their children,
and they teach them, through listening and obedience, how to mature in their
identity as son and daughter. The mother has the delicate task of bringing
the children to the father, as the Spirit leads us to the Father. These
different aspects of family life last forever, whether one is living in
consecrated singleness or in marriage. Every man and woman is called to be
in turn son, spouse, father or daughter, spouse, mother. Trinitarian love
flows this way for everyone. It is the only relationship of love possible
which avoids problems with dependence or independence.
For a community to live
and grow, it must have a paternal and a maternal expression. Within the
structure of the Abbey, for example, the Abbot and the Abbess represent
Christ. Invested with authority, they are the paternal figure for the monks
and the nuns. Beside them, the headmaster and the mistress of the novices
act as mother for those newly called, who are discovering what monastic life
is all about. They watch over each individual very attentively, even to the
smallest details. Communities of this type, built on the trinitarian model,
respect the place of father, mother, and children, in a healthy exchange of
love which helps their members grow and discover their true identity as
God’s sons or daughters.
These new communities
have as their calling to be those homes of love and of light prophesied by
Martha Robin from 1936 on, where each member can draw on as much love and
hope as he or she needs. God calls them forth to function as extended
families, becoming a place of growth and life for so many young people
painfully wounded by the divorce of their parents and the break-up of their
family. These communities are an answer to the current tragedy of the
disappearance of the family.
An Answer to the
Problems of Today
The trinitarian vision
of man is the best antidote to the esoteric trends currently popular in
North America and in Europe. In the “New Age” for example, man seeks union
with God, but by losing himself in “the great All.” In the communion with
the God of the Trinity, on the other hand, each being keeps his or her own
personal identity, without adding or subtracting anything to the self.
Trinitarian union does not negate the identity of those who belong but
rather reinforces it, contrary to mystics who extoll
oneness and loss of self. When the family once again functions on the
trinitarian model, and thus gives the proper place to the father and the
mother in their relationship with the child, then healing will be widespread
in our society.
5. The Holy Family,
Place of Healing
From this, it follows
that the Holy Family is the chosen place for healing. What goes on here?
Simply put: loving to death. The picture of the Holy Family drawn by
Brother Ephraim explains:
- “…Joseph loving Mary
to death…”. In fact Joseph is the model spouse. He gives up his life for his
spouse. His son Jesus will carefully follow his example, as St. Paul points
out in his Epistle: Husbands should love their wives just as Christ loved
the Church and sacrificed himself for her to make her holy (Eph 5:25).
The Savior could say: “As my adopted father loved my mother Mary, I also
give up my life for my Spouse.”
-“Mary loving Jesus to
death.” She is the perfect mother, who fulfilled her motherhood by giving
her son. She pointed Jesus to the Father all her life. She let him go, she
accepted with all of her being the separation that the Cross meant. She gave
up her child, her gentle lamb, into the hands of the Father.
-“Jesus loving the
world to death” lay down his life for the salvation of each person.
This is the encircling
trinitarian love which invites us in.
To Give All and To Give
Oneself
We find this same
message in St. Teresa of the Child Jesus, who is an example of saintliness
for the coming century. This one ambition resonated in her heart: loving to
death, giving life to the point of death, totally giving of the self to the
point of emptying the self (Phil 2: 6-8). In this, there will be true joy, a
spiritual happiness which turns on sacrificial love; in this, we resemble
God the most, we become God. Our world is for the most part dedicated to
self fulfillment and self realization. However, self fulfillment consists
precisely in giving oneself. “To love is to give all and to give oneself,”
Teresa assured us. There is no happiness outside of the total gift of the
self. The direction that family life is to follow is contained in one short
sentence: A man can have no greater love than to lay down his life for
his friends (Jn 15:13). Family is part of the flow of trinitarian love,
where each member gives himself or herself in radical love, to loving to
death (the image of what the Martin family experienced). It is from this
perspective that the Church will go so far as to call a mother blessed who
prefers death so that her child might live.
Broken Families
To say that laying down
one’s life to the point of dying for love is the goal of family life does
not mean to live in a perfect family. We should get rid of our yearning for
the perfect family as much as possible, and not entertain thoughts like,
“Oh! If I could only live in a perfect family!” The imagery associated with
the upper middle class picture perfect Christian family sometimes can be a
bitter illusion. This too perfect family, looking good from every angle, is
only an imaginary ideal. A real family cannot be a dream. In a real family
there will be a crack in the facade, a break where an opening up may take
place. The family with a halo of perfection around it will be a
self-centered family, legalistic, unforgiving, not comprehending weakness,
sufficient unto itself. It won’t need anyone. A true family cannot be self
sufficient, for like the members of the Trinity, like the Holy Family, it
doesn’t exist for its own sake, but stays open to the world.
Our families are
imperfect, fortunately. The stresses of weakness and sin open them to even
greater love, love with mercy. It becomes possible to give beyond what is
fair, beyond what is expected, and to enter into the folly of love, going so
far as the scandal of forgiving and loving one’s enemies. We don’t need our
families to be perfect, for it is far preferable that they be humble, open,
even raggedy and torn. Today’s families are often shattered. That does not
mean the death of the family, but rather a time when the power of God can be
at work in our fragility. In the weakness the gift of God will show itself,
leading us even to loving to death. “Alone, I cannot, but God can, in me.”
When man confronts an impossibility, he also discovers recourse in
confidence and in loving dependency on the Holy Trinity. We should ask the
Holy Spirit to accomplish in our heart what we cannot do by
ourselves.
Education consists in
showing our children divine life by living it ourselves, by being a “trinity
on the earth,” by preaching through the example of our humility. How slow we
are to believe that imperfection will inherit perfection, that poorness in
spirit will inherit infinite love! We should not stay fixated on desiring an
ideal we can never attain, but we should be realistic, and the reality is
the Holy Trinity, love which gives of itself. This reality clashes with all
the pipe dreams, with a TV world that can’t be felt, touched, or tasted
because it is imaginary, a flimsy, virtual world.
It takes a lifetime of
struggles to learn how to accept one’s vulnerability, spiritual poverty and
limits. We need to fall down hundreds of times, experience sickness and
exhaustion and have all kinds of things happen to us that we don’t
understand in order to recognize our limits. So long as we try to bypass our
limits, we run around in circles, we stay outside of our deepest self. It is
an undeniable truth that our deepest self can be fully realized only when it
lives in trinitarian love.
Our lives are above all
marked by the Cross. This is what Croatian couples signify in their marriage
ceremonies when they put their hands together on a crucifix. The family is
not first of all a place of refuge. On the contrary it is where one can find
totally healing love, because it is totally selfless, and lifelong, a love
of God that it is urgent to pass on. It is time to consecrate ourselves to
God in our families, to give ourselves completely and die doing whatever our
work is, by loving to death.
Annexe 1
MONSTRANCE OF THE PRESENCE
In the relationship of
man with God, the flow of love doesn’t begin on the outside, but rather on
the inside. Man is the Temple of God, the monstrance of his Presence. The
Holy Trinity lives within him. God breathes on man at his conception and
gives him the first fruits of his Spirit. Then, in baptism, he begins the
action of the Holy Spirit in him. The trinitarian flow of love becomes
effective and living in his heart.
Psychological
techniques (such as transactional analysis) have spoken in their own way
about interieur circular flow. Three states of the “self” may be described:
the “Parent,” the “Adult” and the “Child.”
- The Parent is
tied to authority and rules. The parent teaches “what I should
do,” “what it is my duty to do,” and establishes the limits by teaching me
what are the “shoulds and the should nots.” This “super ego” corresponds to
the experience of the child with the father’s or mother’s word. It extends
beyond the voice of conscience because it is greatly influenced by
education.
- The Adult is
founded on intelligence and reflection. The adult analyses a
situation, tries to understand the “why” and the “how” and weighs “the pros
and the cons”…
- The Child
deals with the whole gamut of emotions, pleasant or not, such as
suffering, hatred, joy, distress, love, sadness, jealousy, guilt,
bitterness…
Parent, Adult and Child
should operate together in a common dynamic where there will be free flowing
exchange. In fact, what is often seen is a breakdown of relationships within
us, most often coming to a head in the Parent-Child conflict, between the
rules and emotional expression. The three-part relationship becomes a dual
relationship of conflict between Parent and Child.
Here’s an example. The
Child can be submissive, well-behaved and sweet, or the opposite, rebellious
and aggressive. The latter gets easily angered for fear of not being as he
should be, whereas the former stays quiet, incapable of reacting; he prefers
denying himself in order to be loved rather than showing his deep conflict.
The Child is constantly relating to the Parent. By what is experienced in
outside relationships, the Parent calls forth either the submissive Child or
the rebellious Child. I dare to do certain things, not others because the
“’super ego” continually intervenes, controls, makes the Child feel guilty
and distressed, reacting either in submission or in rebellion. The Adult
tries, often in vain, to re-establish the dialogue between the Parent and
the Child. In order to do that, the Adult needs to understand and be
strengthened in order to help the Parent listen to the Child.
Interior healing
consists in restoring the flow, the correct relationship between Parent and
Child so that they can live in agreement inside the self. Behind the
psychological model, we see disclosure of a three-part relationship. Behind
the Parent there is the Father, behind the Adult there is the Son and behind
the Child, the Holy Spirit, for he rules the emotions and especially love.
“Get inner peace and thousands around you will have peace” said Saint
Seraphim of Sarov. That means: “Travel the way of mourning so that the flow
of trinitarian love inside you may live again and you may be free in your
relationship to your father (or to paternal equivalents), to your mother (or
to maternal equivalents), to your brothers, sisters, children…so that you
may exercise sonship in listening and in freely obeying, and paternity over
those who are given to you…”
Schéma 1
The different levels of
relationship in time and in space have the same origin and end. They are all
inscribed (excepting sin) in the flowing love of the Holy Trinity – Father,
Son and Holy Spirit. They are made up of:
- events from the
past and of childhood between father and mother.
- events from the
present with maternal and paternal equivalents.
- spiritual life
in the Holy Family.
The Holy Family,
perfectly inscribed in this dynamic, is the privileged place for healing of
the wounds of childhood and allows for progressive incarnation of the divine
life into our daily life. The Saviour gives it to us so we may better say
yes to mourning and heal our emotional maternal or paternal shortcomings
from childhood. In so far as we consciously recognize what are the painful
experiences from our childhood, we will learn how to live them again
spiritually in the Holy Family in order to grow in
trinitarian love
chapter two
woman, spouse and
mother
introduction
For a better understand
of a woman’s calling, we will look at Mary, little daughter of the Father,
spouse of the Spirit, mother of Christ and mother of humanity. She is not
too good for us to imitate, standing like a statue, frozen in unattainable
perfection. Rather, she is like a stained glass window, allowing divine
light to pass through. She is an example, a living school for all women who
want to welcome God and let his light shine through them.
When St. Teresa of the
Child Jesus states that “the treasure of the mother belongs to the child”
(S. Thérèse de l’Enfant Jésus, PN 54, 5,4,NEC, Cerf/DDB 1992, p. 243), she
understands that Mary is not closed off in inaccessible holiness but desires
to be close to each one of us. Here is what Georgette Blaquiere explains in
her book The Grace to be a Woman: “Misplaced devotion to Mary put her
on a pedestal, so far above women that they disappeared. We must let Mary be
Mary, not because she is a model to imitate but, deeper than this, she is a
living word of God spoken to woman. (…) We must learn to consider her, not
superwoman, nor inhuman because she is perfect, but rather as the most
totally human woman there is, because God’s plan for all women has been
fully accomplished in her” (G. Blaquiere, La Grace d’etre femme, Ed.
Saint Paul 1981, pp. 178-179).
We are going study
three qualities particular to the woman found in Mary:
-
she
receives and gives life;
-
she
designates the father;
-
and she
gives her child to the father.
Part One
The woman receives and
gives life
1. The Woman
Receives (Spouse)
It is her very Nature
Woman in Hebrew is
nekeva, which means “hollow,” “receptacle,” “to create an inside space.”
Whether she wishes it or not, her body shows that she is reception. It is
supple and tender. It is made to console and to give life.
Woman by nature needs
to be loved. That is why she naturally takes on an attitude that is
eminently spiritual, that of letting herself be loved. This comes easier to
her than to the man, because she was created for receiving and welcoming.
She has a particular disposition to receive – so she can give in return. She
is less spontaneously “a doer” than man. She has a greater propensity for an
“inside” love (action of receiving), whereas man favors an “outside” love
(he lays down his life by giving himself). Woman cannot be all she is meant
to be without responding to this ontological need of being loved.
Because she has been
created in this way, as woman and spouse, she is predisposed to a privileged
relationship with God as spouse. St. Teresa of the Child Jesus clearly
illustrates this, for when people talked to her about heaven, she would say,
“I think only about the love that I will receive and about the one to whom I
can give” and also “I need to love, to infinity.” And for Mary too. There
was a priest who used to affirm in the course of his homily that her
holiness does not come only from the fact that she is the mother of God, but
especially from the fact that she let herself be loved, by believing and
receiving the love of God. Mary accepted entering into preferencial love.
And God proposes this very same love to each one of us. With Christ, with
the Virgin Mary, we should be able to say, “I am the beloved, the chosen,
the preferred, the cherished of God.” Yet too often we don’t open ourselves
enough to this love. Mary is proclaimed blessed (Lk 1:48) because she
believed and adhered with her whole being to that electing love.
She is Naturally
Religious
The woman possesses an
ability to receive that relates her naturally to the spiritual world. Her
other name in Hebrew is ishah (aleph-chin-be) whereas man’s name is
ish (aleph-yod-chin). Each has a letter of his or her own. For the
woman, it’s the be, signaling spiritual breath. This is a letter
twice present in the sacred tatragram YHVH (uod be vav be). One can
say that woman is predisposed to a better understanding of spiritual
matters. She will be able to help man enter more fully into the presence of
God, and will awaken in him the desire to know him, to serve him and to love
him. The man has the letter yod, standing for the hand – the hand of
man but also of God. Thus, he will be more naturally inclined to action. To
him in a special way comes actual realization, the incarnation in the here
and now of the plans God has for the couple.
Woman is therefore by
nature more religious than man. It is a recognized fact that the number of
religious orders of women is three to four times higher than that of the
masculine orders, and our Sunday assemblies are often made up of three
quarters women. The Jewish tradition estimates, appropriately, that the
woman is exempt from observing six hundred and thirteen commandments.
Continuously being in touch with the divine thanks to her spousal nature,
she has no need to go to the synagogue to pray.
However, this aptitude
also makes her more vulnerable to the devil’s attacks. She will be the first
to be tempted. For if she is capable of welcoming life and love, she can
also be open to evil. Eve was the origin of the fall for man, but Mary, the
New Eve, becomes the Annunciation, the Temple of Life, source of our
recovery.
Woman’s spousal nature
and her open disposition allow her to more easily perceive the work of God,
the work of the divine Spouse in her and around her. She hears and receives
divine announcements before man does. We see this in Mary who hears what the
angel Gabriel has to say six months before St. Joseph is informed. We see it
in the holy women (in particular Mary Magdeline) who believe in the
Resurrection even as the Apostles are still unbelieving.
She is Prophetic
The woman often
receives the prophetic intuition in the couple and she grasps and
understands the work of the Holy Spirit well before the man. That is why it
is very important for the husband to be particularly attentive to the
intuitions of his wife. The Gospel give us several examples of this in
Mary’s life. At her words little John the Baptist stirs in his mother’s womb
and recognizes in the Spirit the coming of Christ the Messiah. It is again
by her words – See how worried your father and I have been, looking for
you (Lk 2:48) – that Jesus at age twelve accepts going to Nazareth in
order to be about his Father’s business, while being schooled by his
adoptive father Joseph. Again, it is her word at Cana which results in
Jesus’ first miracle. She says to her son, They have no wine, then
she addresses the servants, Do whatever he tells you (Jn 2:5).
However, while it is
true that she is prophetic, the woman does not have the ability to pick time
and moment: this gift, as we have seen, belongs to the man. She will need
her husband to embody her intuitions in the here and now.
She is Interior
A man gives himself
foremost in the work of his hands, risking becoming too oriented toward work
and by what is exterior to him. Paying less attention to himself, he can
take on suffering through giving himself in work, in a calling. The woman
cannot do the same, for she is more interior, running the risk of losing
herself in her own suffering (hysteria is found more often in women). She
can deal with this only by giving herself, through physical or spiritual
maternity. She gives direction to her suffering, then, by giving life.
From what we have said,
it follows that the woman runs the risk of expecting fulfillment from her
husband, whereas she must depend on God in order to live an abundant life.
Above all else, she is the daughter of our heavenly Father. If she continues
waiting for her fulfillment from her husband, she may be driven to
disappointment, concentrating too much on her children to the point of
hindering their development, forming a dependent relationship with them. We
see right along in women the tendancy to dominate, particularly boys, which
can be stiffling for the children.
2. Woman as
Daughter of the Father
Woman is the Wonder of
Man
The woman is sensitive
to how she is perceived to a greater degree than is the man. She needs to
please, to be recognized, admired, and especially loved. This affirmative
has nothing perjorative about it. She carries within her the echo of the
first amazement of man, of Adam for his helpmeet Eve, of the look which
would make her fully woman and the echo of the happiness of man. Adam
marveled saying: This at last is bone from my bones, and flesh from my
flesh! (Gen 2:23) The gaze of the man on the woman fulfills her as a
woman and as a spouse. The calling of the woman is to be the wonder of the
man, and one of the essential needs of the man is to marvel at his wife.
There will be enormous suffering in the couple when the man feels she does
not satisfy his expectations of her.
Daughter of the Father
Consequently, it
matters that she remember she is her father’s daughter, but also and
especially the daughter of her Heavenly Father. Her emotional and spiritual
development has been marked by her relationship to her father. He represents
her first contact with what is masculine and this will have marked
significance for the future. Depending on her own previous choices and how
she herself was hurt as a child, she may alternate between two extremes in
her relationship to men: total dependency (she abdicates to him, letting
herself be dominated, and not becoming all she can be as a woman) and
independence (typical of feminism and its “I don’t need you; I can do it on
my own”).
If as a child the young
girl doesn’t obtain a certain degree of freedom from her father, then as an
adult she will not be truly ready to become a spouse. For if she has not
distanced herself from the male, she cannot be a true counterpart. She risks
going from obedient daughter, conforming to expectations in order to please
her parents, to totally dependent wife. Being a spouse is all about loving.
Being married is to get beyond ourselves in order to give ourselves to the
other. But we can only give what we have, what we are, and if our self is
not fully formed and finished, inhabited by God’s presence indwelling in us,
then the self remains waiting, and is not a giving self.
Under the Father’s
Tender Gaze
True freedom comes only
when we liberate ourselves from worrying about how others perceive us and
commit ourselves to living under God’s loving gaze. This is true of Mary,
where tradition has it that she lived in the Temple at Jerusalem in her
Father’s tender care. We see her totally attentive to the Father. At the
Annunciation, she ponders in her heart the mystery of the birth told to her,
and leaves to the Lord the job of informing St. Joseph (Mat 1:20: Do not
be afraid to take Mary home as your wife…)
Similarly, woman cannot
find freedom and enter into a beneficial relationship with man unless she
assumes some distance from him, placing herself under the Heavenly Father’s
tender care. Our relationship to God the Father is foundational to our true
self. By rejecting paternalism, patriarchal society and the father’s
authority – whose excesses are certainly not to be tolerated – woman has in
effect cut herself off from the paternity of God, who has the power to let
her become an adult, at the risk of staying an adolescent forever.
3. The Mother
Receives and Welcomes Life
It is a very bad thing
to stay just a daughter, finishing as an “old maid.” Every woman is made to
be fully daughter, then spouse and mother: daughter of the Father, spouse of
Christ, mother of mankind, mother of humanity, in and through a maternity
which goes beyond that of the flesh and which constitutes her deepest being.
Mary is Mother of God, mother of Christ, mother of the Church, and mother of
mankind.
Our society is
experiencing a crisis of maternity where women no longer want to have
children and are refusing to give life. This is really the devil’s strategy:
“The Evil One is much more jealous of the woman than of the man, because her
first mission is to be life, to give life, to give birth and in this way to
participate most intimately in God’s work. The serpent knows that in order
to hinder God’s work, he must take on the woman so that he can reduce her
capacitities as life giver” (J. Croissant, La Femme sacerdotale ou le
sacerdoce du coeur. Note: This chapter was edited with her
participation.) If the woman no longer becomes a mother, the world is lost.
For if there are no more mothers, what will our future look like? What will
become of our children? How will God make them his if nobody brings them
forth into the world? (Is 37:3)
The current struggle
takes on an eschatological turn which is more and more pronounced, dealing
with the very identity of the woman, with maternity, and the integrity of
the family. It is certainly not by chance that God said to the woman,
Your yearning shall be for your husband yet he shall lord it over you (Gen
3:16), for by nature the woman risks becoming dominant, precisely
because of her power over the child she has brought forth; this insidious
but profound tendancy is like the derailment of maternal love which can go
from giving to possessing.
In order to escape the
all powerful male, contemporary woman saw no other solution than that of
becoming like him, not realizing that this would lead to a rejection of her
feminity. But it is impossible to work like a man does when there are
children to care for. Maternity quite naturally became the major handicap
she absolutely had to overcome in order to claim equality.
Do we realize the human
and spiritual consequences for our society that result from this fact? Women
are dissuaded from their calling to have children. They are no longer ready
to sacrifice themselves so that their children can become in turn fully
realized men and women, and not wounded people, spoiled by too many material
things, but lacking in this essential love a mother has, ready to give her
life for them.
God chose to need woman
so that he might pass on his own life, just as he chose to use man for
assigning paternity. To give life is to pour out blood and when blood is
lost, life is lost. Shedding blood in order to give life is a significant
part of every woman’s nature. Her monthly periods are the powerful sign of
this fact.
The woman is
responsible for all those that she has taken in and cares for. She is
responsible for relationships within the family, having the care of each
person. The Jewish tradition recognizes in her this essential role of being
the soul of the house, the guardian in a way of the Presence of God in the
home. She answers for those whom she has welcomed and received. In
recognition of this she is given the blessing of the light which opens the
family liturgy of the Sabbath. In fact the sages of Israel mention that
since the fall into darkness came through Eve, it is by the woman that the
light must be re-introduced. This perspective speaks eloquently to us as
Christians, since the new Eve, the Virgin Mary, brought light into the world
by giving us her son. And it is remarkable that this tie between the woman
and light goes well beyond the bounds of the Judeo-Christian tradition and
can be seen in other cultures: in Africa, for example, where the mothers
keep a small lamp burning, and when the man returns home he feels a
presence, a life.
The woman’s body has
been created to welcome and receive life. This physical reality is the sign
of a spiritual reality. The woman is the Temple of life. A rabbi said it
this way: “When I draw near my spouse, I am accomplishing a priestly act,
for I am entering into the temple of life.”
4. The Mother,
God’s Tenderness
What are the qualities
of a mother? Tenderness, love, patience, sweetness, a listening ear. When
looking for the definition of the word “tenderness” in the dictionary, the
first example given is the “tenderness of a mother.” For the father is the
protector and deliverer, and the mother is the consoler to her child. The
liturgy invokes Mary this way, as “tenderness of God,” “consoler of the
afflicted.”
Tenderness is not
incompatible with strength. The blessed Mary of the Incarnation knew this
and wrote: “Mary is the strong woman, the expression of God’s tenderness.”
Tenderness which is not cloying or stiffling, but rather strong and
exacting. It is standing at the foot of the cross that Mary lets her child
go to the Father. She shows not only her own tenderness, but also the
strength and tenderness of another. She counts on this Other and this is
what allows her to stay courageously nearby her Son. She is willing to be
consoled and loved by the Father. God has crowned her with love and
tenderness. As tenderly as a father treats his children, so Yahweh treats
those who fear him (Ps 103:4 and 13). Now, please let your love comfort me,
as you have promised your servant. Treat me tenderly, and I shall live… (Ps
119:76-77). I will betroth you to myself for ever, (…) with tenderness and
love; I will betroth you to myself with faithfulness, and you will come to
know Yahweh (Hosea 2:21-22). Mary is mother because she receives in her
very self the tenderness of God from the time of her Immaculate Conception,
and she allows it to flow through her in a unique way starting with the
Annunciation.
The presence of the
mother is felt in a different way from that of the father. The mother
touches her child and speaks to it, awakening it to life. In certain
cultures, Hindu, for example, the child is massaged during its first year.
Through this, the child develops a consciousness of the body, a confidance
in the self and a sense of well-being, essential to his or her growth.
Unfortunately, in the West, mothers too often let themselves be overwhelmed
by other jobs. They no longer know how to caress their child enough. Because
it is the expression of the tenderness of God, the love which passes through
the mother will limit the presence of guilt feelings.
When there are
shortcomings in mothering, the child lives out two interior conflicts:
- death desires and
urges. Difficulties in living and tendancies toward depression that are so
frequent today often come from an early maternal hurt, perhaps taking place
even before birth;
- a feeling of guilt,
meaning an unpleasant impression of not being as one should, shame at what
one is, a feeling of indignity or impurity experienced even in the body.
This feeling has taken root in separations, negative and perjorative words,
and in gestures and attitudes which have not nurtured the child.
Doubtless, we have all
received a lot from our mother, and that has made us what we are. But each
one of us, however, has been lacking maternal love to some degree, for we
have inevitably experienced times in childhood when we were not loved. What
we have not received from our mother, the Virgin Mary can give us since she
offers us the One who is Life, Jesus Himself.
part two
the mother designates
the father
Mary plays an essential
role in the discovery of St. Joseph and the Father. We will discover this in
three ways:
-
The woman
brings forth man;
-
The woman
submits;
-
The
mother names the father.
1. The Woman Brings
Forth the Man
Every man is born of a
woman. Thus, Scripture presents Eve as being genuinely the mother of all
those who live (Gen 3:20). The psalmist equally sings: But all call
Zion “Mother”, since all were born in her (Ps 87:5). And Christ on the
Cross asks Mary to be the Mother of all mankind, through designating the
disciple he loved to her. So tradition has interpreted his last words,
Woman, this is your son. And to John, This is your mother (Jn
19:26,27 The original text even says: This is THE mother.)
Man, then, is born of
woman, and it is not merely a question of birth in the flesh. Within the
Holy Family, Mary brings forth St. Joseph in his role as father of the
Messiah. Mary had already begun to be a mother for six months when Joseph
learns, via the angel’s announcement, that he is called to be the adoptive
father of the Son of God. Maternity precedes paternity, and it is the
absolute condition for it: for the father of course cannot be father except
by the mother. If the woman keeps the child for herself, the man is excluded
from his paternity. Mary gives Jesus to St. Joseph, and draws her spouse
into a pure and selfless love, totally oriented to the Father. In this way
he will be prepared to receive in perfection the grace of the amazingly
unique paternity laid on him.
The woman, according to
what Genesis tells us, is a helpmate for the man (Gen 2:18). But because the
woman brings forth the man, because she in some way “gives birth to” her
spouse, she can also dominate him. She simply possesses a greater maturity
than he does: for this reason she confirms him and helps him grow in his
calling. That is why the Word of God asks her to submit (Eph 5:21-24). The
temptation which threatens the woman is to dominate the man by her emotional
power. The man, weakened by her, risks reacting by using masculine force to
overpower her in turn.
If the woman brings
forth the man, he, however, is her shepherd. Scripture specifies that the
woman is taken from Adam’s rib (Gen 2:21,22). Here we find an expression of
the marvelous equilibrium of the Trinity, where none of the divine Persons
is self sufficient nor dominates the other. If we forget any part of this
communion, we run straight into an anthropological catastrophe. Woman,
unfortunately, has held on to the notion that submission implies male
domination. Has she forgotten that she is in the strong position because she
brings forth the man? God asks her to accept this man as her shepherd (ibid.).
That is why it is said
that everything begins with the woman. If she loses her calling, the man can
no longer find his. It is because she wants to be like him (feminism) that
the man is lost. There is no more father because there is no more mother.
The man only comes into paternity with the woman’s help. The man can no
longer be father because the woman is dominating him. That is why we insist
on the importance of the submission of the woman.
2. The Submission
of the Woman
This is the stumbling
block for feminism which dares to label the Apostle Paul a woman hater! In
fact this comes from past sufferings and from a faulty understanding of
Scripture.
A call to love…
Since the woman by her
very nature needs to be loved and protected, she has to love her husband.
This is why it is only asked of men that they love their spouse. Husbands
should love their wives (Eph 5:25) says St. Paul in the immediate
continuation of the same text. This implies that herein lies the difficulty
for the man and not for the woman. The apostle never said to woman “love
your husband.” The invitation consists in loving one’s wife even as Christ
loved the Church and gave himself up for her. How did Jesus love? He who
said to us that a man can have no greater love than to lay down his life
for his friends (Jn 15:13) offered his life for the Church, his spouse.
And he leads us into the same sacrifice. This is my commandment: love one
another, as I have loved you (Jn 15:12). St. Paul’s exhortation comes
down to saying: Husbands, love your wives more than your selves, laying down
your life for her. In this way St. Joseph loved Mary to death. The calling
of the husband is to lay down his life for his wife by giving himself
totally to her. And the woman has the right to expect a love which will go
all the way.
A calling to be holy
It is to such a spouse
that the woman is asked to submit herself faithfully. Because he came from
the woman, he can only give himself entirely to a woman who submits to him.
The difficulty for the woman is not in loving her husband, but in accepting
not to dominate him and also taking him as her shepherd. The man for his
part will have a problem faithfully loving his wife. He is weaker than she,
taking his roots from her. Thus, if he is in danger of being dominated by
her, he risks no longer respecting her and may become unfaithful. A
dominating woman becomes a spouse who limits a man by her dependence and
emotional childishness, or by the opposite, through searching for
independence in work or in marital infidelity. As we see in Scripture, the
man has the right to require holiness from his spouse: as beautiful as a
bride, all dressed for her husband (Rev 21:2). Woman is the reflection of
man’s glory (I Cor 11:7) affirms St. Paul. There is always in man the
desire for the perfect woman, this “Eshet Hail” mentioned in the
book of Proverbs (Prov 31:10 Eshet Hail means “a perfect woman” in
Hebrew). A perfect wife—who can find her? She is far beyond the price of
pearls. (Prov 31:10) Happy the husband of a really good wife; the number of
his days will be doubled (Ecc 26:1).It is said likewise of Christ and
the Church: He made her clean by washing her in water with a form of
words, so that when he took her to himself she would be glorious, with no
speck or wrinkle or anything like that, but holy and faultless (Eph 5:27).
A man often is looking
for a mother in his wife. Mary is the perfect mother who can help a man to
reconcile himself with his own mother and to love his wife.
A Helpmate by his side
Man, as we have said,
needs woman. Through her he gives his utmost for only she can give life to
his virility. Let her again find her rightful place by his side and together
they will bear fruit. They will “know” each other. “To know” literally means
“to be born with,” to receive together, and one through the other the gift
of life, the gift of God. The woman who refuses the seed of her husband and
wishes to be self-sufficient condemns herself to sterility; not only
herself, but also the whole family circle. She paralyzes them and herself by
depriving her husband of all action and responsibility for originating life.
There is between the
woman and God something like a passive co-operation, a sort of partnership.
She participates in bringing forth man, in the birth of humanity, by uniting
herself to God. It is through the yes of Mary that salvation entered the
world. The yes of Joseph is second: he will permit the realization of the
incarnation. But it is through the yes of the woman, by the unconditional
gift of her life, that the world is saved. She precedes man in understanding
divine mysteries, and through her welcoming the Word in her body, she brings
it forth into the Kingdom. She shows the way. That is why, through her
specific mission in the plan of God, it is she who must first change (and
why she is the first target of the devil).
“The decline of the
two sexes in the fall has led to the subservience of the woman to the man…
She who should become his companion…must through her own free will decide to
come ‘help’ the man and thus allow him to become what he should be” (E.
Stein, Woman and her Destiny, Ed. Amiot Dumont 1956). The woman can
only do this by coming back to the Father. Her whole path of conversion will
be made up of passing from domination to submission. And this submission
will be mysteriously and incredibly redeeming.
From domination to
submission…
To submit is “to put
oneself under” the protection of the other. Just as Christ is the head of
the Church, the husband is the shepherd of his wife precisely in as much as
he lays down his life for her. St. Joseph is the head of the Holy Family,
whom the Virgin Mary obeys in everything. The angel comes to him, warning:
Get up, take the child and his mother with you, and escape into Egypt
(Mat 2:13. Also 2:20 and 22) and that is sufficient for Mary, letting
herself be guided by the Father through him. Thus, when the woman submits to
the man, it is God whom she is obeying through the limitations of her
husband, in the hope of carrying out his will (cf. I Ph 3:1-5).
Eve sinned for two very
important reasons. For one thing, she was no longer in submission to her
husband, by neglecting to consult Adam, and for another, she cut herself off
from God, not speaking to him and forgetting the word of the Father which
said: You may eat indeed of all the trees in the garden. Nevertheless of
the tree of the knowledge of good and evil you are not to eat… (Gen 2:16,17).
She even transformed the divine word by adding: nor touch it (Gen 3:3)..
Fearing God, Adam and Eve fled his face and found themselves face to face
with each other. Man went from marvel to reproach, and from this point on he
remains suspicious of woman as the one who can make him fall. At the same
time, he will always remain searching for the marvelous being that God has
picked out for him. The woman, on the other hand, looks to the man to fill
her expectations, expectations that no man could ever fill. She knows from
experience that she is weak and that her expectations make her predisposed
to be dominated in spite of herself, just as she predisposes man to take
advantage of his strength.
Submission is a
requirement for the man as much as for the woman. However, the mutual
submission of both spouses has its roots in the woman. How can a husband
submit to his wife without being dominated, if she isn’t first submissive to
him? In the way shown in the Gospels of renouncing ourselves through love of
the other, the woman is first. It is she who introduces man into this new
type of relationship, which is no longer a search for the self through
domination of the other, but a gift of the self for the other.
The submission of the
woman is eminently redeeming. For even as her insubmission led all humanity
into sin, so her submission and her offering of herself to God is in his
plan for humanity’s redemption. This is why one can affirm that, if man is
first in the plan of Creation, woman is first in the plan of Redemption. She
finds her joy in living in submission to her husband, and he is satisfied in
giving himself entirely to his wife.
3. Mary names the
Father
If the woman, child of
the Father, brings forth the man, if she accepts entering into this
submission to her husband, then it is easy for her to name him father. The
mother is indispensable to bringing the father out into the open. It is she
who first points him out to her child, naming him “daddy” in the child’s
presence. Mary names St. Joseph in this way in the episode of finding Jesus
in the Temple, when she says to her Son, See how worried your father and
I have been, looking for you (Lk 2:48).
It is the same for us.
How relations were with our father in childhood in some way lays the
foundations of an incarnate relationship with God our Father. On cannot
disassociate the two entirely. Mary teaches this to us when she reminds her
Son that his father is looking for him. It is as if she were saying to us:
“You cannot be about the business of your Heavenly Father if you are not
busy with the affairs of your dad. You cannot be about the works of God if
you don’t accept the paternity that St. Joseph is desirous of exercising
toward you. Like me, he is looking for you so that we can help you enter
into the Kingdom, to let Jesus be born and grow in you, to make possible the
passage from the mother toward the father, and everything that you were not
able to realize in your relationship to your mom and dad.”
Mary would like her
spouse to be better known. She shared with St. Teresa of Avila how very
happy devotion to St. Joseph made her. In the same way to Mr. Olier, she
said, “I have nothing more dear in heaven and on earth, after my Son.”
On certain icons, Jesus
is less than three years old He still isn’t weaned, and we see him with his
arms around his mother’s neck, his cheek pressed against hers. On other
icons it is just the opposite, with Mary presenting the Child Jesus to us.
He seems to be looking at us. In fact, he is turned toward his father
Joseph, toward his Eternal Father. Here again, we see the role of Mary.
Jesus listens attentively to the teaching of Mary who is pointing out St.
Joseph to him. He leads us into heartfelt filial devotion for his Father.
Let yourself listen to
Mary and ask her, “Lead me to the Father.” She will answer your prayer, and
give you Jesus even as she shows us the Father. She will open the way for
you into intimacy with St. Joseph and will teach you how to murmur in your
heart along with the Holy Spirit the Name of the Father. And the more that
Jesus grows in you, the more you will discover the Father, for it is
written: No one can come to the Father except through me (Jn 14:6). To
have seen me is to have seen the Father (Jn 14:9).
Part Three
The mother offers her
child to the father
Offering the fruit of
one’s being also entails a separation, meaning suffering. Mary fully
consents to separating from her only child She lets him go toward his
Father. She has probably glimpsed the necessity and the price of this
offering from the time of her fiat at the Annunciation, being
troubled and feeling anguish at the words of the angel Gabriel (Lk 1:29).
She felt it even deeper when Jesus disappeared for three days in Jerusalem
(Lk 2:48). And she suffered fully at the foot of the Cross when her heart
was pierced listening to the words of Christ, Woman, behold your son.
It is here in fact that the Church Fathers recognize the sword prophesied by
Simeon: this horrifying anguish of Mary facing the suffering of separation.
From then on her heart is open so that God’s tenderness and his mercy are
poured out on all mankind. She becomes “Mother of Mercies” by taking as her
children even those who were crucifying her Son. Christ invited her to full
pardon by bringing her to where she handed over, as the Eternal Father had
done (Jn 3:16: God loved the world so much that he gave his only Son….)
her body’s treasure into the hands of man.
It is normal, then, for
the woman to suffer at being separated with her little one. For her it is
another way to pour out her blood. And it is the calling of the father to be
the sword of separation between the mother and her child. And it is for the
woman to accept the distancing, even as she agonizes, so that her child
might have life and meet with the father.
Mary did not keep her
Son for herself, but she gave him. She will know how to take care of the
children that we entrust to her. If you are worried about your children,
offer them to Mary and implore her with confidance. She will know how to
intercede for them and to give them back to the Father.
We can bring in here
the testimony of a mother who lived through this agony with Mary’s help,
when her son Samuel was called to Heaven:
“When my son was in a
coma after his accident, the Lord gave us the grace to fully realize our
calling as parents. Instead of trying to hold our son back to keep him for
ourselves, we prayed to know what he wanted from us in his last hour, and it
was that we accepted letting him go to the Father, and even more, helped him
get there quicker. I’ll explain. Because of a painful past, and the death of
his little brother Stephen, among other things, and then this last accident
where he probably believed his other brother dead, Samuel was in anguish and
guilt; we could feel this clearly while praying with him at his bedside. We
decided therefore to help him make his “passing” in peace while invoking
over him the saving power of the Blood of Jesus poured out for him in his
Passion and his Death on the cross. We accepted in faith that this prayer of
healing would bring results, and we were then able to tell our son, “go, run
into the arms of the Savior and don’t worry about us.” Certainly we were
even then hoping for a miracle, but we had done what every parent must do:
helped our child be born into Heaven. Two days after his death, a sister in
our community told me a recent dream of hers. She had seen Samuel in an
immense light, jumping for joy, saying, “Victory, the Blood of Jesus has
washed me of all my sins!” She knew nothing of the prayer that we had prayed
over Samuel.
Curiously, the great
suffering that I was experiencing as a result of these events was much
alleviated several times by the Virgin Mary, but in an unusual manner. For
example, during the night when I knew that they were taking his heart in
order to graft it into someone else, I was imagining as a nurse the whole
surgical procedure, and my suffering became so intense that I was sorry I
had ever agreed to donate his organs, feeling that I had suffered enough
already. And then all of a sudden I thought about the Holy Virgin Mary, and
I saw her watching the soldier running his sword through the heart of Jesus,
and her horrible suffering became “mixed” with mine. Then I saw that hers
was greater and I wanted to console her, and as I was doing that, my own
suffering and anguish was changed into peace and I fell asleep.
Another time, just
after my son was buried, I was exhausted and upset, and a brother of our
community stopped me. He reminded me that he was supposed to be ordained
three days later and asked me to come to his ordination, telling me, “If you
don’t come, I can’t be ordained…” There again a terrible, heart-wretching
suffering overtook me and an enormous “no”, an enormous revolt rose in my
heart. No, this isn’t my son. It’s Samuel who should have been the priest
and I would have loved to attend his ordination. And then, again, my sadness
was eased and I found the strength to say, “Yes, I’ll be there for your
ordination.”
The help that the
Virgin Mary brings us is to teach us compassion, which lets us get out of
ourselves and helps us to be healed of our possessive loves, so we may enter
into compassionate love.”
chapter three
Reborn in Mary
1. Infinite Need
“I need to love to
infinity,” said St. Teresa of the Child Jesus. These words fit exactly with
the deep yearning of our heart! We are all searching for absolute happiness,
wanting to be loved and to fully love. Yet each day we realize that we can’t
do it. Why? Because we forget what the Savior says: What do you have that
was not given to you? (I Cor 4:7. Man is made in the image of God (Gen
1:26), and he has been created to love in a divine way. From the very
beginning he is “capacity” and he can only give what he has first received.
Each day, we come face
to face with our limits, with our incapacities of loving which plunge us
back into our misery and show us finally that we are inept at loving,
continually running up against an intangible “I can’t,” and “I’ll never make
it.” Yet, in the depths of our being there lies a limitless desire,
ceaselessly reminding us that we are made for love. It pushes us to the
realisation of life’s goal and source of true happiness, that is, giving
ourselves in love, as Christ gave himself entirely to the Father.
2. Cut off from our
Origins
Why can’t we satisfy
such a thirst? Because we are concentrating on reaching our goal but we are
cut off from our roots. Can a tree grow to be mature without developing good
roots reaching deep into the soil? How can we give something that we haven’t
first taken in? How can we offer what we haven’t received? We would like to
love even before getting healed from our own incapacities of letting
ourselves be loved. We are inevitably discouraged in this hope because we
are trying to do and to give what we don’t have. The fundamental error is in
fact a sin of pride. It consists in thinking of myself as a spring, whereas
my calling is to be a fountain channeling water from the spring.
In order to fulfill our
life’s goal and to live in the fulness of love, we must first go back to our
origins, drawing from the life force that pours out from its roots. This
step is fundamental in the spiritual life. The Talmud puts it this way: “If
you want to know where you are going, know where you have been.”
3. A New Birth
Jesus teaches
Nicodemus: …Unless a man is born from above, he cannot see the kingdom of
God (John 3:3). Nicodemus doesn’t understand and asks: “Can he go back
into his mother’s womb and be born again?” Jesus answers him: You, a
teacher in Israel, and you do not know these things! (John 3:10) Many
people today react just like Nicodemus, especially those who follow the New
Age philosophy. They try hard to get reborn in their mother’s womb by
looking for a lost paradise, hoping to usher in an era of utopian happiness.
Looking or turning back always leads to sterility, as we know from the story
of Lot’s wife (cf. Gen. 19:26). Furthermore, Jesus warns us in the Gospel:
Once the hand is laid on the plough, no one who looks back is fit for the
kingdom of God (Luke 9:62).
Christ’s answer to
Nicodemus enlightens us. It is not about returning to a mother’s womb, but
rather being born through water and the Spirit (John 3:5). And this
new birth happens in Mary, our spiritual mother, figurehead of the Church.
With her, we will go
through four successive stages, which are neither exhaustive nor obligatory:
(1) become aware of our
refusal to let ourselves be loved,
(2)
find our
roots,
(3)
be reborn
in Mary
(4)
and
consecrate ourselves to Mary.
All along this path we
will be learning about spiritual growth, and this will allow us once again
to receive and welcome and let ourselves be loved.
Part One
Refusing to let
ourselves be loved
1. Doubting Love
The first step is the
hardest to take. It calls for opening ourselves up to the very intimate
desire to be loved in order to become aware of the often subconscious
resistance we have in letting go and letting ourselves be loved. This step
calls for a lot of vigilance, time and therefore patience. Without guidance
from above, we do not realize the nature of what is blocking us, hindering
us from welcoming life and love. Each of us thinks: “But this is exactly
what I want! I don’t see where there’s a problem!” By saying that, we don’t
realize that we live with an incapacity to welcome. Spiritual life consists
in letting ourselves be loved by God so that we in turn can give ourselves
to love. If we let love love us, we will be consoled in all our distress and
anguish and we in turn will love and will become consolers for our brothers
(cf. 2 Cor. 1: 4-6).
To show clearer where
the difficulty lies, we will answer this question first: “Where do we have
our greatest need for love without ever being successful in letting
ourselves be loved?” Without question the answer is, “precisely where we are
hurt.”
We see love coming to
us daily in different ways. It can be through a person or an event, or by a
direct intervention from the Lord in our heart through the gift of grace.
But as soon as love gets close to us, to visit and purify our pain, we
immediately get our defences up so it will leave us alone. Then we act
aggressively, impatiently, and so on.
Why do we act this way
almost in spite of ourselves? Because in the original hurt, going back to
early childhood, we still keep, even subconsciously, the memory of a very
painful experience of the lack of love or even of aggression. The little
child we were was born receptive and open to the tenderness that his heart
needed in order to live. But several times he ran |